How Low Can You Go – Well No Lower Than The MDL

by | May 12, 2021 | Reports, Resources

Lab workers filling samples

There is always confusion on how low a lab can go when it comes to what their instruments can detect.  The EPA and TNI came together and changed how Method Detection Limits (MDL) are established for an instrument or group of instruments. They wanted to account for the inherent contamination that occurs when samples are prepared. They also wanted, by this change, to stop labs from creating non-supportable low detection limits.

What does MDL mean?

So what does MDL really mean, and why do we care about how it is prepared?  Under the new definition, it means a lab can be 99% confident that a result is a detectable hit above the background contamination found in prepared blanks.  This is probably not clear to you because it is not clear to those in the laboratory industry.  Let me break down a simplified explanation of what is going on.

Every instrument has an electronic signal that is influenced with how much “noise” is created when all the moving parts and electronics combine together (the output of which is then interpreted by a signal detector).  For a lab to be able to give you legally defensible results, those results have to be somewhere above the background signal (the noise) that were determined by an MDL study.  The study is undertaken to find the beginning of the method’s confidence level, this level is where 99% of the recoveries are discernable/detectable above the background signal.  Therefore, 1% of those results that come in above the background signal are statistically not valid.  To establish the confidence level where we can account for the 1% error rate we establishing reporting limits that are greater than the MDL baseline. The area between the MDL and the reporting level is a no man’s land and does not have legally defensible confidence. Results in this area are qualified as estimated to account for the potential for error.  

How low can you go?

Here is the answer to question posed above – only at or above the reporting limit can a lab report to you results with confidence and without qualifications – but with qualifications they can report down to the MDL level. 

The “old” way of looking at MDLs never accounted for the inherent bias of the noise associated with blank analysis; this and other practices, led to artificially low MDL values that were then marketed to capture or retain business.  The “new” way to look at MDLs takes into account blank results versus spiked results.  The MDL value is statistically derived based upon a minimum of seven blanks versus seven spiked samples taken over a two year period.  After the compilation and calculations of these results, the larger number between the two becomes the MDL baseline. 

Statistically determined MDL results should be cut and dried right? Its science… what could go wrong… plenty.  Laboratories can manipulate study parameters, adjusting spiking levels and how samples and blanks are prepared in order control variability.  Variability has a direct influence on how a constituent of the calculation (the standard deviation) is established, which can lead to a lower (and more marketable) MDL baseline.  This means that limits may be forced lower than they should be – funny, I just mentioned this twice it must be important.  Which is why the EPA and TNI decided to look at blanks and spikes quarterly over a two year period to account for a more natural variance which is a little more difficult to manipulate.

The big take away

So what can you take from this blog? Well if you only want to be 99% confident that the potential contaminant that you are looking for is there, then yes, the MDL is as low as you can go.  You can do this by asking the lab to report down to the MDL. If you ask a lab to report data between the MDL and the reporting limit then that data should be qualified as estimated and more than likely it will not be acceptable for most government permit requirements.  But if you want to do legally defensible regulatory work where the 1% error rate is not acceptable then you must accept nothing lower than the lab’s reporting limit.

Join us for more information

about the environmental laboratory industry, plus events we’re attending and hosting.

Understanding Control Charts

What are control charts? Control charts are a visual depiction of ongoing data points that various statistics are applied to.  The EPA used to require a laboratory to adjust its spike acceptance recovery percentage based upon how spikes were recovered over time...

How Low Can You Go – Well No Lower Than The MDL

There is always confusion on how low a lab can go when it comes to what their instruments can detect.  The EPA and TNI came together and changed how Method Detection Limits (MDL) are established for an instrument or group of instruments. They wanted to account for the...

Significant Figures Use by Laboratories

What determines the amount of numbers you see on your report? Each test that we do has a level of sensitivity associated with it.  Tests that you can do by visual inspection have the lowest sensitivity and are usually reported in whole numbers in a range of say 1 to...

New Drinking Water COC for Coliform Bacteria Available

We’ve updated our Drinking Water COC/Submittal Form for Coliform Bacteria. You can download it off of our  Resources page.    

The Argument on “Total” Metals

Why is there still an argument about which digestion method should be reported as “total” metals? When you’re looking at an old QAPP, permit or analytical report, you might have noticed that there were different listings for how the metals were to be identified and...

Exciting changes: a new location

After 16 years in our current location, we a relocating our Coeur d'Alene laboratory service to our Kellogg location and establishing a new sample drop-off location in Hayden. Here are some important dates to keep in mind: March 18, 2021: The last day to drop samples...

What to Do With a Result Above Your Permit Limit

When people come to SVL Analytical, they’re often looking for data to show that they’re in compliance with the applicable regulations or permits. What happens when the data you get back isn’t in compliance?  That can be a stressful situation and we want to help...

Reading your Report

If you’re not familiar with the format and terminology, your sample’s analytical report may be confusing. Here are some explanations to get you started.

My water tastes funny, what should I test for?

There are many reasons for household water to have an unusual odor or taste.

New Drinking Water COC Available

We’ve updated our Drinking Water (Chemistry) COC. You can download it off of our Resources page.